"pjhusa" (pjhuskinja)
03/14/2017 at 20:42 • Filed to: None
1
9|
"pjhusa" (pjhuskinja)
03/14/2017 at 20:42 • Filed to: None | 1
| 9 |
It’s hard to believe that the current GLE/ML is soon to enter its sixth year of existence. Here’s what Mercedes-Benz is cooking up for the next generation. The proportions seem to have strayed from those of the last generation, instead opting for a more compact appearance reminiscent of the GLC. However, they do remind me of the first-generation (W163) ML.
Source:
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Steve in Manhattan
> pjhusa
03/14/2017 at 20:45 |
|
Am I the only one here who thinks this line(s) gets worse-looking every year (or at least no better)? And the GLK (if that’s what it’s called) is awful. Even VW does better, and Mazda beats them all.
404 - User No Longer Available
> Steve in Manhattan
03/14/2017 at 21:01 |
|
People don’t care. All they want is the badge and a cheap lease deal.
GE90man
> pjhusa
03/14/2017 at 21:11 |
|
WHY DOES EVERYTHING MERCEDES EVER MAKE HAVE TO LOOK SO SIMLIAR
|
pjhusa
> Steve in Manhattan
03/14/2017 at 21:14 |
|
The GLK is indeed awful, but its successor (the GLC) looks pretty nice:
Personally, I’ve always liked the ML/GLE line, but that may be due to preexisting biases (I have one myself). But these spyshots are definitely a bit disconcerting...
|
pjhusa
> GE90man
03/14/2017 at 21:15 |
|
Uhh... there is a decent amount of camouflage on this car, and I do not understand how you could come up with such a conclusion from that.
whoarder is tellurium
> GE90man
03/14/2017 at 21:27 |
|
GLREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
|
Steve in Manhattan
> 404 - User No Longer Available
03/15/2017 at 00:53 |
|
that’s a plausible explanation ...
|
Steve in Manhattan
> pjhusa
03/15/2017 at 00:55 |
|
possibly there are far better looking Kias but it’s past my bedtime
|
GE90man
> pjhusa
03/15/2017 at 06:28 |
|
just the shape of the body and the outline of the lights point out pretty well that they’re same shape as EACH AND EVERY OTHER MERCEDES ON THE ROAD